18
November
2013
|
04:46 PM
America/New_York

Plaintiffs’ Statement Following Oral Argument In Appeal Against GSU Ruling

Oral Argument Heard Today in Eleventh Circuit Court

Atlanta, GA - Oral arguments were heard today in the appeal filed by the publisher plaintiffs against the ruling by Judge Orinda Evans in the copyright infringement suit against Georgia State University. The plaintiff appellants — Oxford University Press, Inc., Cambridge University Press and SAGE Publications, Inc. — released the following statement:

“The US Circuit Courts of Appeals exist to review decisions of the federal District Courts when litigants believe the lower courts have issued rulings based on errors of law or mistakes of material fact. We have appealed to the Eleventh Circuit Court because we believe that Judge Evans made errors of law and ignored key material facts in the evidentiary record established by the parties’ documentary submissions and in the trial itself.

“Anti-copyright advocates have depicted the case as simply about a handful of specific ‘fair use’ determinations that we were permitted to challenge under Judge Evans’ construction of the case. That depiction is wrong. This case was brought to target GSU’s systematic abuse of the e-reserve system, avoiding payment for the non-transformative use of copyrighted works under the guise of fair use, and to protect the intellectual property rights of authors and publishers who produce high-quality educational materials on which colleges and universities depend.”